State of Nevada

Nevada State Board of Nursing
". . . protecting the public's health, safety and welfare 
through effective nursing regulation . . ."

Seal of Nevada

 

Text Version of Nevada State Board of Nursing News

 

June 2004

Apprentice Nurse Programs

Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners

Roles of Consultant, Surveyor, and Nurse Educator

Your Right to Refuse An Unsafe Assignment

Dr. Rosemary Witt Begins Another Chapter

Dr. Patsy Ruchala Named Orvis Director

Dr. Carolyn Yucha Named First UNLV Nursing Dean

Nevada Nursing Schools Offer Innovative Choices

Sexual Misconduct

Validation and Verification

 

Apprentice Nurse Programs

Bridge from education to practice builds confidence, refines skills

 

    Confidence.

 

    That’s what you get when you work as an apprentice nurse.

 

    Educators, regulators, hospital administrators, and students have a wealth of perspectives about nursing. Yet on the subject of apprentice nurse programs, they share a common view: such programs build confidence—a crucial ingredient to the success of new nurses.

 

    They also help students refine the skills they’ve learned in their nursing education programs, and provide needed support for the journey toward becoming full-fledged, professional members of a health care delivery team.

 

    Two years ago, the Board put together guidelines for health care facilities that wished to hire student nurses in apprentice positions. Many hospitals employed nursing students, but until recently, they had apprentices performing basic functions rather than the full range of allowed skills.

 

    Today, several Nevada hospitals have full apprentice nurse programs, and several more hospitals and long-term care facilities are exploring the possibility of developing them. Among those with full programs are Washoe Medical Center and St. Mary's Hospital in Reno; Carson-Tahoe Hospital; Humboldt General Hospital in Winnemucca; South Lyon Medical Center in Yerington; and St. Rose Dominican Hospital, Valley Hospital, and MountainView Hospital in Las Vegas. Several more Las Vegas hospitals are developing, or interested in developing, full programs. Those include the University Medical Center, Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, Summerlin Hospital, Seven Hills Hospital, and Spring Valley Hospital.

 

    “It is a win-win for everyone involved,” said Mary Ann Lambert, MSN, RN, whose roles as a regulator, educator, and nursing supervisor give her a unique perspective. Lambert is a Board member; an assistant professor with the University of Nevada, Reno, Orvis School of Nursing; and a nursing administrative manager at Washoe Medical Center.

 

    “While our students receive an excellent education in the theory and practice of nursing, they need a reality base. There is no substitute for actually working full shifts under the direction and supervision of an experienced registered nurse,” Lambert said. She added, “The research is strongly indicating a need for a bridge between education and practice in today’s complex healthcare environment. Apprentice nurse programs that allow students to practice the full range of skills allowed under the Board’s guidelines serve as that bridge.”

 

    It was a student who sparked the expansion of Washoe Medical Center’s apprentice nurse program. The program’s administrator, Karen Winter, MN, RN, director of professional practice, said it sprung from a proposal by Rob Judd, BSN, RN, a graduate student at the University of Nevada, Reno, Orvis School of Nursing. He is also a staff nurse in Washoe’s telemetry unit. In his thesis, Judd proposed expanding the apprentice nurse  program to include the Board’s RN Apprentice Nurse Skills List.

 

    Winter had been researching the concept herself and found a solid basis for it in the nursing literature. “The Board said we could do more and our students were saying the same thing,” Winter recalled. “We listened, and the program we developed has really taken off.”

 

    Washoe added an Apprentice Nurse II (AN II) position in the Spring of 2003. (A student can work as an Apprentice Nurse I (AN 1) after completing the first semester of the first year of a nursing program that includes basic nursing skills education. An AN1 works as part of a healthcare team, providing support for basic functions on the nursing unit). 

 

    “The AN II position offers senior students the opportunity to really acculturate to the role of professional nurse,” Winter explained. “Students get caught up in tasks such as giving meds, but along the way, we see professional conduct being instilled in them. They are learning how to resolve conflicts, how to get feedback from others. Socialization, which takes a long time, is one of the primary aims of the program.”

 

    To further that aim, each AN II works under the direction of an RN preceptor. Once the RN is designated as a preceptor, that RN receives training in adult learning theory, coaching and mentoring skills.

 

    If an AN II has been taught a skill on the Board’s skills list, he or she can perform it under the direction and guidance of the RN preceptor, with whom the apprentice nurse is paired at all times.

 

    “As we’re learning skills in school, we’re putting all the pieces together here at work,” explained Laurie Daggitt. “I feel like I’m safer, because I know how to take full care of a patient.” Dawn Dollarhide agreed, adding the experience has taught her important organization and prioritization skills. Both are senior TMCC nursing students and AN IIs in Washoe’s intensive care unit.

 

    Tammie Brewer, RN, is Dollarhide’s preceptor. “Dawn is comfortable and confident in a setting where the fears are great,” she said. “I think this program gives students a more realistic insight into nursing than they can get just from what they learn in school.”

 

    “The apprentice nurses are pretty close to being ready to start work,” added Daggitt’s preceptor, Cindy Pffirmann, RN. “Both Laurie and Dawn are very confident in their skills at this level. There is a huge difference in their confidence compared to other new grads.”

 

    Andrea Bourque, a senior Orvis nursing student and AN II on the general surgical unit, said, “It’s a really good foundation for things you don’t have time to become an expert in while you’re in school—things like confidence, organization skills, time management, therapeutic relationships, and clinical skills.”

 

    Andrea Adams, a senior TMCC nursing student, said she feels very well prepared, and very fortunate, to be in the program. “I’m applying the theory that I’m learning in school right away--in full, 12-hour shifts,” she said. “You don’t get that kind of unfragmented time in clinicals.” Adams is an AN II in Washoe’s telemetry unit.

 

    Wendie Rains, is a senior Orvis nursing student, an AN II who is paired with Deb Salaber, BSN, RN, in Washoe’s oncology department. She said, “This experience has given me confidence in the knowledge I acquired at UNR. It’s reinforced everything I’ve learned.”

 

    To Rains, being an apprentice nurse is meaningful on a personal level, as well as a professional one. “Everyone in oncology has been very nurturing and supportive, “ she said. “And since apprentices are not included in the staff count, we can truly make a difference in our patients’ lives, because there are two of us, where normally there would be only one.”

 

    Reflecting on the often stressful and difficult nature of a nurse’s job, Rains said she believes the apprentice program will help avoid the burnout new nurses often experience. “If you go straight from school to your first full shift as a nurse, the stress can be overwhelming,” she explained. “I can’t imagine what it would be like not having gone through this program.”

 

    These words are music to Winter’s ears. “So far, we’ve had great success, great quality, and high retention,” she said. In its first full year, 60 students have been employed as AN IIs, and of those, 51 are working, or planning to work at Washoe after they graduate.

 

    Graduation does not mark the end of their education, however. To Winter, it is just the first step. “We look upon professional nursing as a life-long process of education. Our philosophy is to focus on and promote evidence-based practice,” she said. Winter added that the apprentice nurse program is a key part of Washoe’s goal of attaining magnet hospital status. It is also something that will continue to grow—she said she will be soon hiring a dedicated educator to oversee the program.

 

    Confidence is a shared trait among the apprentice nurses interviewed for this story. So is leadership. Andrea Bourque is the president, and Wendie Rains is the treasurer of the Orvis Student Nurses Association. Dawn Dollarhide is president of TMCC’s graduating nursing class. Wendie Rains and Sheila McFall are both leadership students at the Board. Their preceptors are, respectively, Executive Director Debra Scott, MS, RN, APN, and Associate Director for Compliance Chris Sansom, RN.

 

    At the time of this writing, all the apprentice nurses featured in this article were still students. By the time this magazine is published, they will have graduated from their nursing education programs.

 

    The Nevada State Board of Nursing thanks them for sharing their experiences and congratulates them on their graduation!

 

SIDEBAR

The Apprentice Nurse Program is designed to allow a nursing student, currently enrolled in a nursing program, to work at a health care facility providing nursing care following the board’s approved skills list. The program offers the student the opportunity to practice their clinical skills and to acclimate to the role of the professional nurse. Recently, the Board removed the restriction that program enrollment was limited only to students in Nevada nursing programs.

 

The current approved RN Apprentice Nurse Skills List can be found on the board’s website www.nursingboard.state.nv.us. 

 

It is the responsibility of the hiring facility Director of Nursing to:

 

Ensure the student (in-state or out-of-state) is currently enrolled in a program of professional nursing that is approved by that state’s board of nursing or appropriate state agency authorized to approve nursing programs.

Ensure the nursing program (out-of-state) is also nationally accredited through either the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) or the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE).

Ensure the student (in-state or out-of-state) is currently enrolled in a program of professional nursing and maintains enrollment during participation as an Apprentice Nurse.

Verify the skills the student (in-state or out-of-state) has been authorized to perform are on the Board-approved skills list.

 

Accountability for compliance with all program requirements remains with the Director of Nursing, as this individual has responsibility for all nursing activities within their facility. 

 

A student’s enrollment in the Apprentice Nurse Program ends upon graduation from the nursing program. At that time, the student becomes a graduate nurse and must possess an Interim Permit to practice nursing. It is the responsibility of the Director of Nursing to ensure that after graduation, the student no longer practices nursing as an Apprentice Nurse. It is also the responsibility of the Director of Nursing to ensure that all graduate nurses have active Interim Permits authorizing the practice of nursing.

 

This article spotlights just one of the many success stories associated with the Apprentice Nurse Program. Students praise the program for enhancing their nursing skills and confidence, while giving them the opportunity to familiarize themselves with their future professional roles. Directors of Nursing have found the program a valuable recruiting, retention, and professional development tool.

 

If you have any questions about the Board’s RN Apprentice Nurse Skills List, the responsibilities of a Director of Nursing regarding apprentice nurses and graduate nurses, or other general questions about nursing education programs, please feel free to contact the Board’s Licensure, Certification and Education Office in Las Vegas.

 

Board Adopts Practice Decision Regarding Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners
Supersedes 1991 decision

Acting upon the recommendation of its Nursing Practice Advisory Committee, the Board at its March meeting adopted a practice decision regarding Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners. Below is the text of the decision, which is also on the Board’s web site www.nursingboard.state.nv.us in the Practice Information section.

The Nursing Practice Advisory Committee spent more than a year reviewing, discussing and revising the SANE practice decision adopted in 1991. The process was wide-ranging and thorough, involving several meetings in both Las Vegas and Reno with representatives from law enforcement, nurses, doctors, victim advocates, and professional associations.

The committee also conducted extensive research to define parameters for SANE practice regarding age, competency, referral, and collaboration among the sexual assault team members. Public comments were taken by the committee in September 2002, December 2002, February 2003, June 2003, August 2003, October 2003, and December 2003.

The practice decision is the result of gathering national information, Nevada-specific information, and current best practices from the International Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN) and other highly regarded individuals in the field of forensic nursing. The IAFN provides for a SANE-A certification for nurses which allows RNs to collect evidential material on adult and adolescent victims. The increased scope of practice includes utilizing a colposcope which is ordinarily out of the scope of practice for RNs.

Other changes incorporated in the practice decision include a separation of adult/adolescent and pediatric SANE practice, the deletion of a definition of “acute,” deletion of the requirement that the SANE call a physician or an APN prior to doing a pediatric assessment, an effective date of January 1, 2005 for the required SANE certification, the requirement for appropriate referral, the requirement for all pediatric cases to be peer-reviewed, and a narrower definition of the expanded SANE practice. The rationale for these revisions is generally based on the philosophy that the SANE is first an RN and then has a narrowly expanded practice based on the SANE certification and competency. 

Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Practice Decision

An RN may function as a sexual assault nurse examiner provided the following guidelines are followed: 

  1.  The dimensions of the specialty practice of the SANE include the collection of forensic material from an acute victim of sexual assault through the use of a “Rape Kit.” A victim of sexual assault is considered acute if there is reason to believe that there may be forensic evidence on a victim’s body.  Non-acute exams shall be referred appropriately. A “Rape Kit” is utilized by the SANE to collect forensic material as appropriate for age and situation of the victim.
  2. The Registered Nurse shall demonstrate competency, knowledge, skill, and ability pursuant to NAC 632.071, 632.224, and 632.225. The nurse shall maintain documentation of continued competency which shall be completed annually and include successful return demonstration and peer review of the minimum number of cases required for continued certification by IAFN. 
  3.  Initial and ongoing certification through the IAFN as a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent Certified shall be maintained to allow the nurse to practice in this capacity and to use the designation “SANE-A” to indicate his/her practice specialty. The SANE-A certification requirement becomes effective as of January 1, 2005. The SANE shall maintain available age-specific certification.
  4. There are agency policies and procedures and any required standardized protocols in place allowing the SANE to administer and dispense specific drugs and devices. These protocols are approved by both medicine and nursing.
  5. The nurse maintains accountability and responsibility for nursing care related to this procedure and follows the accepted standard of care, which would be provided by a reasonable and prudent nurse.  Protocols for this procedure are to be maintained at the practice site and be available for review by the board.
  6. The SANE performs this procedure in consultation with the physician or advanced practice nurse, never independently.

Additional requirements for pediatric cases (individuals of less than thirteen years of age) include:

  1. Every pediatric case shall undergo retrospective peer review.
  2. All exams, which are deemed to have abnormal genital findings, shall be referred to a recognized child abuse expert who is a physician or advanced practice nurse or final diagnosis.
  3. Collection of evidential material on a pediatric victim shall only be performed by a SANE who has ongoing, documented competency based on the Pediatric Education Guidelines for Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners of the IAFN.

(4/04)

For information on SANE certification, please visit IAFN.org.

 

Board Addresses Roles of Consultant, Surveyor, and Nurse Educator
Nevada license required for nurse who delivers patient care

Acting upon the recommendation of its Nursing Practice Advisory Committee, the Board at its March meeting adopted a practice decision regarding persons acting in the role of consultant, surveyor, or nurse educator. Below is the text of the decision, which is also on the Board’s web site www.nursingboard.state.nv.us in the Practice Information section.

A person who practices nursing or delivers patient care in relation to patients who are located within the State of Nevada must be licensed by the Nevada State Board of Nursing. The following activities include, but are not limited to, conduct that is considered to be delivering patient care in role of the licensed nurse:

1.      Any intent to enter into a therapeutic relationship with the patient.

2.      Any notation or documentation in an individual patient’s medical record.

  1. Designation or acting as Chief Nurse.
  2. Accepting an assignment for patient care.
  3. Patient education.
  4. Any nursing education that involves direct patient contact.
  5. Designation as or acting as an RN who supervises care provided by another RN, LPN or CNA.

The following activities include, but are not limited to, conduct that is NOT considered to be delivering patient care in role of the licensed nurse:

  1. Inspection of written corporate policies and procedures to evaluate compliance with same.
  2. Instruction of corporate employees on issues of compliance with corporate policies and procedures.
  3. Training of persons by product representatives, so long as no patient care is provided.
  4. With prior patient permission, observe medication pass or wound care procedures.
  5. Auditing patient records.
  6. Teaching continuing education courses.
  7. Making recommendations regarding the delivery of patient care.

  

The Board Supports Your Right to Refuse An Unsafe Assignment
Nurse Practice Act cites three conditions for patient abandonment

The mission of the Nevada State Board of Nursing is to protect the public’s health, safety and welfare through effective nursing regulation. The Board, backed by Nevada nursing law, strongly supports the right of nurses and nursing assistants to refuse assignments they believe to be unsafe.

We realize this issue is of great concern to Nevada nurses and CNAs, who are dedicated to providing safe, competent care to their patients. In addition to answering calls and emails about unsafe assignments, Board staff members give presentations on this topic to nursing associations, nursing conferences, nursing schools, and at health care facilities across the state. We have also published articles in past issues of the Board’s newsletter, and we distribute fact sheets outlining the process described below.

Helping Nevada nurses and CNAs understand both their rights and obligations when it comes to refusing unsafe assignments helps the Board fulfill its mission of protecting the public. We all share the goal of ensuring safe, effective, quality health care for the citizens of Nevada.

            The Board receives many calls from nurses and nursing assistants who feel they are being asked to choose between placing their patients at risk or putting their licenses in jeopardy. Many think they have no choice but to accept assignments they are unable to safely manage, to perform acts they aren’t qualified to do, or to work longer hours than they believe they can physically or mentally endure.

            Often, refusing an assignment does not seem an option for these who believe either the patients would be endangered or they would lose their jobs if they simply said “No.”

Yet, all licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants in Nevada are subject to the Nurse Practice Act that holds them responsible and accountable for nursing judgments, actions, and competence, and requires them to safeguard the patient. Accepting an assignment that the nurse or CNA knows she or he is not qualified for, and/or accepting an assignment that places a patient in jeopardy, are violations of the Nurse Practice Act and may result in disciplinary action. However, the Board has never disciplined a nurse or CNA for properly refusing an unsafe assignment.

How can nurses and nursing assistants protect their patients and protect their licenses and certificates? Prevention and early intervention are always a place to start. Nurses and CNAs should know the laws and regulations that govern their practice and clearly understand what constitutes a violation of the Nurse Practice Act. For example, nurses and CNAs may be told that refusing to accept an assignment is “wrongful abandonment,” but in fact, the Nurse Practice Act cites three conditions that must exist before such an action would be considered abandonment by the Board.

Specifically, according to NAC 632.895(6):

“An act of patient abandonment occurs if:

(a) A licensee or holder of a certificate has been assigned and accepted a duty of care to a patient;

(b) The licensee or holder of a certificate departed from the site of the assignment without ensuring that the patient was adequately cared for; and

(c) As a result of the departure, the patient was in potential harm or actually harmed.”

Evidence of all three conditions must be shown before the Board may consider disciplinary action against a nurse or CNA for patient abandonment. (During fiscal year 2002-2003, one complaint against a nurse met this legal requirement and resulted in disciplinary action. The nurse left her shift after being on duty for a few hours, did not have permission to leave, and did not give report on her patients to anyone before leaving. In other words, she met all three legal criteria for patient abandonment.)

Also, nurses and CNAs may be disciplined if they accept assignments they are not competent to perform. If they do, they may place the patient in danger, and they’re in violation of the Nurse Practice Act (NAC 632.890 (4), assuming duties and responsibilities within the practice of nursing if competency is not maintained, or the standards of competence are not satisfied, or both.)

It should be noted that the Board has no jurisdiction over employment or contract issues. Well-intentioned nurses and CNAs may feel like they’re in a “Catch 22,” where if they practice in accordance with the law, they will keep their licenses or certificates but lose their jobs. Unfortunately, sometimes leaving a position is the only option. Here are some things to consider—

·        Place patient safety and well-being first. Act in good faith.

·        Know the laws and regulations that govern your practice.

·        Build a defense for why an action (or act of omission) was unavoidable. Document carefully. Be able to demonstrate that the course of action was what would have been followed in a similar situation by a reasonable and prudent nurse with similar education and experience.

·        Continue to advocate for safe nursing care for patients.

 If you have a question about how to refuse an unsafe assignment, contact the Reno office.

 

Dr. Rosemary Witt Begins Another Chapter
After 31 years of service, she steps out of nursing department chair position 

How do you describe the accomplishments of someone like Dr. Rosemary Witt, PhD, RN, who has served Nevada’s nursing population for three decades? Someone who has been a leader in nursing education, regulation, and professional advancement during the state’s most rapid period of growth and change? 

You ask her to tell her own story, in her own words.

 In 1970, I was contentedly teaching at the University of Washington, Seattle, when I came to a conference on “loss” in Las Vegas. The conference was being held at UNLV. I sat in the Moyer Student Union looking down the mall and thought ”what a neat place,” besides I had been in town a whole week, and it hadn’t rained once!

Also, on that plane trip, I met this fellow who worked for the Environmental Protection Agency and we started this long distance relationship. After a year, I thought, “Why not move to Las Vegas?” So I applied at UNLV, and as luck would have it, the Department of Nursing’s Associate Degree program needed an instructor for psychiatric nursing. I accepted the offer of a position, and have been affiliated with the nursing program ever since. Oh yes, to answer your question, the relationship was much better long distance than up close! He left town and I stayed.

After I had been on campus two years, the Chair of the Department was selected to be the Dean of the College of Allied Health. I was asked to serve as Chair, probably because I had experience in baccalaureate education and the Department was launching an RN to BSN program.

I loved the administrative role and remained in it for 31 years. Effective July 1, I am stepping out of the leadership position. The role has provided me with a wealth of growth-producing experiences. Academically, I have had the privilege of working with faculty who demonstrated the ability and willingness to move from an associate degree program to a generic baccalaureate program, then to add a master’s program, offer the BSN and MSN program via distance education, devise an RN to MSN program, and effective Fall, 2004 initiate the new Ph.D. in Nursing program.

Professionally, I was part of the steering committee to obtain the charter to start Zeta Kappa, the local chapter of Sigma Theta Tau, which began in 1982. I was privileged to serve as the first president of Zeta Kappa. I served in several state level positions in the Nevada Nurses Association, including the most time-consuming job of secretary.

For several years I had the privilege of serving as an accreditation site visitor for the National League for Nursing. The last couple of years I have served as member of the site review team for the Northwest Accreditation Association and look forward to continuing that role, now that I will have new duties.

A professional highlight was serving on the Nevada State Board of Nursing. I served on the Board seven years in the 80s, and was President five of those years. At that time we thought we were writing cutting-edge regulations. Now, of course, when you examine decisions in retrospect, they look rather timid, and in some cases you would like to ask for “do overs.” 

I was on the Board when the rules and regulations for certifying nurse practitioners were developed. We had many an interesting meeting with the Board of Medicine and the Board of Pharmacy in our quest to get prescriptive privileges approved.

During my time on the Board, we also made many changes related to how the Board would assist chemically dependent nurses, moving away from a strict disciplinary model to a model which would assist the nurse and the profession. And of course, I had a great interest in nursing education regulations, and was part of the group that helped to reduce the faculty to student ratio to 1:8.  I remain on the Board’s Nursing Education Advisory Committee.

The role of Chair also provided me the opportunity to collaborate with the health care leaders in the Southern Nevada, as we weathered various nursing shortages and challenges. One time, when I was on the Board of Nursing, student nurses were inadvertently dropped from a law when it was being rewritten and student nurses were not allowed to give medications!

The leadership position has provided an opportunity to work with a wide variety of community leaders in the Southern Nevada Medical Industry to find ways to address the current nursing shortage. Serving on the Board of Directors of HealthInsight continues to broaden my knowledge base about issues in health care.

Do I have regrets about my career path? Absolutely not. I think I have had the best of all worlds.  I have been able to assist in the development of a strong nursing program, assist students grow and change, be involved in activities that matter to nurses and patients, and by periodically teaching clinical courses, keep my psychiatric clinical nursing skills acceptable, if not cutting edge.

Am I retiring? No, not yet. I will continue teach some of the courses in the RN to BSN degree program and clinical courses in psychiatric nursing. In the immediate future, I will be offering Dean Yucha assistance to make the transition as seamless as possible.

 

Dr. Patsy Ruchala Named Director of Orvis School of Nursing
She serves on boards of three nursing journals and blue ribbon panel exploring nurse education

--By Pat McDonnell, University of Nevada, Reno, publications writer

             On July 1, Patsy Ruchala will begin working with the University of Nevada, Reno, to help address one of the most daunting challenges facing the state: the country’s most extreme per-capita nursing shortage.

Ruchala, associate director for graduate nursing programs at Georgia State University in Atlanta, will become director of the university’s Orvis School of Nursing in Reno.

“Dr. Ruchala is an outstanding educator and experienced administrator whose expertise in the profession, enthusiasm for our Orvis School of Nursing and desire to make a difference in meeting the need for nurses in Nevada will have an immediate positive influence,” said Dean Jean Perry of the College of Human and Community Sciences.

Nevada has the lowest number of licensed nurses per capita in the country (520 nurses per 100,000 people, compared to a U.S. average of 782 nurses per 100,000 people, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Nursing professors are urgently needed to educate prospective new professionals in the field.

“There is also a need to replace nurse educators at all levels of teaching,” said Ruchala, a decade-long faculty member and director of master’s degree programs in nursing for five years at St. Louis University before joining Georgia State’s Byrdine Lewis School of Nursing in 2001. “The mean age of nursing educators (nationally) is 54, and we’ve seen the existing work force in both clinical work and education retire. Younger men and women, in many cases, have chosen other professions.”

Ruchala, who has teaching experience through the doctoral-degree level, said she emphasizes “a team approach to administration.” She has relied on building a foundation of quality bachelor’s degree programs in both Georgia and Missouri, leading to a fuller development of strong graduate education.

With her strength in preparing both nurses and nursing educators, Ruchala comes to Nevada following an academic year in which the University of Nevada has more than doubled enrollment at its nursing school ¾ a state-supported goal. Some 86 nursing students were admitted to the school last fall, with 38 undergraduates and 10 masters degree candidates slated to graduate in May ¾ twice the typical graduation pattern for the school in recent years.

Ruchala completed her diploma in nursing in 1973 at Alton Memorial Hospital in Alton, Ill. She received her bachelor’s and master’s of nursing degrees at Governors State University in University Park, Ill., and earned her doctorate in nursing science in 1991 at Rush University in Chicago.

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing has invited Ruchala to be a featured speaker in assessing student outcomes, and during the last year she was appointed to the Southern Regional Education Board’s Blue Ribbon Commission on the Preparation of Nurse Educators.

She serves on the editorial board of three professional journals ¾ the Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, Neonatal Network: The Journal of Neonatal Nursing and the Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

Alwilda Scholler-Jaquish has served as the nursing school’s acting director since May 2003. She will continue her work with the school as an associate professor.

“Alwilda has been instrumental in helping the nursing school develop a strategic plan that expands our graduate programs and attracts more students by tailoring course offerings to their specific educational needs,” Perry said of Scholler-Jaquish. 

 

Dr. Carolyn Yucha Named First Dean of the School of Nursing at UNLV
She serves as a nursing journal editor and conducts nationally funded research projects

 Dr. Carolyn Yucha has been appointed the inaugural Dean of the School of Nursing at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She will be leaving her position as Professor and Associate Dean for Research at the University of Florida and begin her new role on July 1, 2004.

Yucha’s doctorate is in Physiology from the State University of New York, and she holds a master’s degree in Adult Health Nursing.  She serves as editor of the journal Biological Research for Nursing, and has received funding from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research, and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine for her research.

Recent publications have focused on biofeedback modalities and blood  pressure, relaxation strategies for patients with chronic pain, and hemodynamics and arterial properties in response to mental stress in subjects with borderline hypertension.

Yucha has made numerous international and national presentations and will be instrumental in extending the school’s research activities. In accepting the position, Dr. Yucha said, “I believe it to be an exciting time in the development of the nursing programs at UNLV.  The school’s current programs provide a strong foundation for future growth and development.” 

 

Nevada Nursing Schools Offer Innovative Choices
Board approves curriculum changes for fast-track, part-time, and on-line programs 

In response to the state’s pressing need for more nurses, Nevada’s nursing schools are developing innovative programs to attract more people into the profession.  At its March meeting, the Board approved curriculum changes for fast-track, part-time, and on-line programs.

Nevada State College was approved to begin a fast-track Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program this fall. The accelerated track is delivered in a compressed format over 12 months and is designed for persons who have previously completed a bachelor’s degree in any field. They also must have completed all nursing prerequisites for the nursing program, have a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or higher, and a nursing-specific GPA of 2.75 or higher. The individuals take the same number of courses as in a traditional track, but in a reduced number of weeks.

Truckee Meadows Community College will also be offering a fast-track ADN program beginning this summer. Students will spend the first semester in a 13-week summer session, then continue through three traditional semesters of 14 to 16 weeks each. Credit requirements are the same as in the traditional program.

The Board approved the Community College of Southern Nevada’s request to offer a part-time ADN program which will offer the same 72 credits of the full-time program, but take place over seven semesters instead of the traditional four. The Board also approved the college’s Rural Community Practical Nursing Program for students in the Caliente, Mesquite, Pahrump, and Tonopah areas. It will be identical to the college’s current LPN program, except that all classes will be offered through on-line distance education and all applicants must have current Nevada certification as CNAs. Students will travel to Las Vegas for their clinicals and skills laboratories.

If you would like to know more about the nursing education programs offered by Nevada’s universities and colleges, you will find links to all seven of them on the Board’s web site.

 

Sexual Misconduct
Guidelines for professional practice

   Nurses and nursing assistants need to be knowledgeable about the phenomenon of sexual misconduct in practice and the implications for the public health, safety, and welfare. We have a professional responsibility to protect the public by taking proactive measures to develop personal and collegial awareness regarding the potential for harm of professional sexual misconduct.  Education and development of insight, as well as confronting sexual misconduct in practice, is essential in this protection. 

    The Board has a policy defining its stance on sexual misconduct. This policy helps guide the Board in meeting its responsibility to protect the public through education and regulation based on clear guidelines for practice. The policy outlines definitions and issues regarding the nurse/client relationship, consent, and discipline as they relate to sexual misconduct. The summary below is designed to help you understand your professional role as it relates to sexual misconduct.

Definitions

Professional Sexual Misconduct
Sexual misconduct is any sexual or romantic behavior between a nurse/nursing assistant and an individual who seeks or receives the service of that provider. It involves a breach of trust and the abuse of power, influence, and/or knowledge inherent in one's profession to obtain sexual gratification, romantic partners, and/or sexually deviant outlets.

Sexual Contact
Sexual contact between a nurse/nursing assistant and a client refers to any sexual or sexualized behavior in any form, and may include, but is not limited to the following:

1. Any behavior or involvement, whether inside or outside of the professional setting which:

may reasonably be interpreted as romantic involvement

may reasonably be interpreted as intended for the sexual arousal/gratification of the nurse/nursing assistant, the client, or both

may reasonably be interpreted by the client as being sexual in its intention

2. Specific actions which may constitute sexual misconduct by a nurse/nursing assistant may include, but are not limited to:

any direct, intentional genital stimulation or sexual gratification via oral, manual, genital, instrumental, or other means

any manipulation of a body part or penetration of any bodily orifice by any means   that is not medically indicated

any exposure, touch, or manipulation of the breasts, nipples, genital area, buttocks, or anus that is not medically indicated, is not reasonably part of routine care of the client, or is engaged in for the purpose of sexual gratification

any medically indicated procedure or aspect of routine care involving the sexual and/or private parts of the body that is sexualized, prolonged, or altered in order to provide sexual gratification.

any sexualized comments or gestures, any verbalizations intended to invite or  suggest sexual contact or a romantic relationship

kissing, fondling, dating, or flirting with clients

3.  Any sexual behavior or involvement with a client not currently receiving care from the nurse/nursing assistant which meets any one or more of the criteria above, or which:

occurs as a result of knowledge derived by the nurse/nursing assistant from within the context of a professional relationship

results from the exploitation of a client's emotions, trust, or influence in a previous nurse/nursing assistant-client relationship

reasonably appears to constitute an abuse of power on the part of the nurse/nursing assistant.

Professional Boundaries
Professional boundaries are the limits of the professional relationship between the nurse/nursing assistant and the client which provide a means of controlling the power differential and allow for a safe and therapeutic connection based on the client's needs. The nurse/nursing assistant is responsible for delineating and maintaining the boundaries.

Issues regarding the nurse/client relationship are divided into two main areas:

(1) Recommended guidelines to the licensee or certificate holder

and

 (2) Termination of nurse/client relationship

Recommended guidelines to the licensee or certificate holder
Be aware of any feelings of sexual attraction to a client and discuss such feelings with a supervisor or trusted colleague. Under no circumstances act on these feelings or discuss them with the client.


Transfer the case of a client to whom you are sexually attracted to another nurse.

Be alert to signs that a client may be interested in or encouraging a sexual relationship. All steps must be taken to ensure that the boundaries of the professional relationship are maintained.

Respect a client's dignity and privacy at all times. Examinations and treatments involving the sexual or private parts of the body can increase the client's vulnerability and take steps to prevent or minimize any such trauma.

Provide a professional explanation of the need for each of the various components of examinations, procedures, tests, and aspects of case to be given.

Communicate with clients in a clear, appropriate, and professional manner.

Never engage in communication with clients that could be interpreted as flirtatious or which employs sexual innuendo, off-color jokes, or offensive language.

Do not discuss your personal problems or any aspects of your intimate life with a client.

Termination of the nurse/client relationship is the responsibility of the nurse or nursing assistant - factors to be considered.
Formal termination procedures

Transfer of client to another nurse/nursing assistant

Whether care was terminated for the purpose of entering into a sexual or romantic relationship

The length of time that has passed

The length of time of the relationship

The extent to which the client has confided personal or private information to the nurse or nursing assistant

The nature of the client's health problem

The degree of the client's emotional dependence and vulnerability

The extent of the nurse or nursing assistant's general knowledge about the client

Sexual contact between a nurse or nursing assistant and a former client after termination of the nurse/nursing assistant-client relationship may still constitute unprofessional conduct if the sexual contact is a result of the exploitation of trust, knowledge, influence or emotions derived from the personal relationship.

Consent

A client's consent to, initiation of, or participation in sexual behavior or involvement with a nurse or nursing assistant does not change the nature of the conduct. The nurse or nursing assistant has full and sole responsibility to maintain proper boundaries. It shall not be a defense or a mitigating factor that the client was capable of consenting, or that the client does consent or that the client agreed to, proposed or initiated the sexual contact or the sexual or romantic relationship.

Discipline

Upon a finding that a nurse or nursing assistant has committed unprofessional conduct by engaging in sexual misconduct, the Board will impose such discipline as the Board deems necessary to protect the public.

Conclusion

This information is offered as a proactive measure in guiding nurses and nursing assistants in maintaining the standards of professional and prudent practice.

 

Validation And Verification
What’s the difference between the two forms and how much do they cost?

If you have been issued a license or certificate, but have not yet received your “hard card,” you may pay for written validation. Just walk in to either the Las Vegas or Reno office, confirm your license or certificate is active, and pay the $25 validation fee (check, money order, or exact change). Board staff will give you the validation form to show to your employer as evidence you hold an active license or certificate and are just waiting for the hard card to be mailed to you. If you are using your Nevada license or certificate to endorse into another state, mail or take that state’s verification form to the Las Vegas office, along with a check or money order for $25, payable to the Nevada State Board of Nursing (or exact change if paying by cash in person). The Las Vegas office will process your request as soon as possible, then send written verification of your Nevada license to the state to which you are endorsing.